PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.01%
Negative net income growth while VTLE stands at 158.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-23.63%
Negative yoy D&A while VTLE is 38.27%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-26.56%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
253.33%
SBC growth well above VTLE's 23.73%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-35.14%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VTLE is 158.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-34.13%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VTLE at -75.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
19.05%
Some inventory rise while VTLE is negative at -36.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
44.37%
AP growth well above VTLE's 36.95%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-35.14%
Negative yoy usage while VTLE is 143.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
124.07%
Well above VTLE's 162.76%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-22.19%
Negative yoy CFO while VTLE is 114.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-4.92%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -302.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-1249.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -96.46%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
334.85%
We have some outflow growth while VTLE is negative at -96.22%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-248.55%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -312.72%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
98.59%
Debt repayment growth of 98.59% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.76%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of VTLE's 84.34%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.