40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.83%
Some net income increase while VTLE is negative at -98.34%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
74.82%
D&A growth well above VTLE's 110.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-265.96%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VTLE stands at 100.86%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-21.74%
Negative yoy SBC while VTLE is 35.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-233.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VTLE at -182.97%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-221.70%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VTLE at -1752.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
343.06%
Some inventory rise while VTLE is negative at -421.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
101.74%
Lower AP growth vs. VTLE's 421.54%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-233.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VTLE at -32.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-30.77%
Both negative yoy, with VTLE at -240.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
9.03%
Some CFO growth while VTLE is negative at -13.93%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-30.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while VTLE is 75.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
98.14%
Acquisition spending well above VTLE's 18.18%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -38.96%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
71.61%
Investing outflow well above VTLE's 75.92%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-200.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -1255.56%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.44%
Buyback growth below 50% of VTLE's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.