PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
49.12%
Some net income increase while VTLE is negative at -373.71%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy D&A while VTLE is 115.06%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-79.38%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VTLE stands at 126.69%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while VTLE is 185.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
1185.19%
Slight usage while VTLE is negative at -111.45%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
7.94%
AR growth while VTLE is negative at -19.02%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while VTLE is negative at -794.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
26.41%
Some yoy usage while VTLE is negative at -71.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
1749.16%
Some yoy increase while VTLE is negative at -100.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
1.38%
Some CFO growth while VTLE is negative at -12.76%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.29%
Lower CapEx growth vs. VTLE's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while VTLE is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
238.11%
We have some outflow growth while VTLE is negative at -1905252.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
18.24%
We have mild expansions while VTLE is negative at -362.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-86.82%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VTLE is 3610.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.41%
Buyback growth below 50% of VTLE's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.