40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-66.50%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-0.85%
D&A shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
89.98%
Deferred tax growth of 89.98% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.53%
Working capital of 72.53% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.53%
Growth of 72.53% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
65.57%
Growth of 65.57% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
36.66%
CFO growth of 36.66% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-11.37%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-127.67%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-447.60%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-70.02%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
2.34%
Issuance growth of 2.34% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
50.69%
Buyback growth of 50.69% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.