40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.69%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
0.13%
D&A growth of 0.13% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
275.64%
Deferred tax growth of 275.64% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-328.54%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-328.54%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
224.19%
Growth of 224.19% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-28.82%
Negative CFO growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
21.91%
CapEx growth of 21.91% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Proceeds growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-85.51%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-458.90%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-294.84%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-20.41%
We reduce issuance yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
17.81%
Buyback growth of 17.81% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.