40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-74.25%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 2.60%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-1.52%
D&A shrinks yoy while Energy median is 1.12%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
94.57%
Deferred tax growth of 94.57% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
350.00%
SBC growth of 350.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
470.37%
Working capital of 470.37% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
470.37%
Growth of 470.37% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
268.18%
Under 50% of Energy median of 1.17% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
68.77%
Operating cash flow growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 10.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a strong operational advantage vs. peers.
-0.31%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-83.65%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
3013.64%
Purchases growth of 3013.64% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-91.24%
We liquidate less yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
3.68%
Growth of 3.68% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-43.80%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.