40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
142.24%
Net income growth of 142.24% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-4.31%
D&A shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
2466.67%
Deferred tax growth of 2466.67% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-13.64%
SBC declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
183.80%
Working capital of 183.80% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.80%
Growth of 183.80% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-12.28%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-18.66%
Negative CFO growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-9.59%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-2816.67%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-112.13%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
1373.68%
Proceeds growth of 1373.68% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-52.56%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-233.86%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
68.51%
Debt repayment growth of 68.51% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.