40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-962.12%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 2.71%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
3.33%
D&A expands slightly while Energy is negative at -2.16%. Peter Lynch might see peers pausing expansions more aggressively.
-813.33%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
94.64%
SBC growth of 94.64% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
95.74%
Working capital of 95.74% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.74%
Growth of 95.74% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
214.46%
A moderate rise while Energy median is negative at -1.29%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
84.67%
Positive CFO growth while Energy median is negative at -17.17%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
14.12%
CapEx growth under 50% of Energy median of 18.86% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
113.94%
Acquisition growth of 113.94% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-14.12%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-40.95%
We liquidate less yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
13.68%
Growth of 13.68% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
104.06%
Under 50% of Energy median of 9.87% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos sees potential overspending or major liquidity drain overshadowing typical sector levels.
94.52%
Debt repayment growth of 94.52% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.