40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.68%
Net income growth of 5.68% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-15.45%
D&A shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
6.23%
Deferred tax growth of 6.23% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
366.67%
SBC growth of 366.67% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
1933.33%
Working capital of 1933.33% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1933.33%
Growth of 1933.33% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-38.95%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-38.17%
Negative CFO growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-0.95%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-83.29%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-116.44%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
442.34%
Proceeds growth of 442.34% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
0.99%
Growth of 0.99% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-354.10%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-1508.54%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.