40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
38.07%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x Energy median of 27.45%. Mohnish Pabrai would find it notably strong if sustainable.
-5.43%
D&A shrinks yoy while Energy median is -3.94%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
17.62%
Deferred tax growth of 17.62% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
275.00%
SBC growth of 275.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
1.72%
A slight increase while Energy median is negative at -12.20%. Peter Lynch might see peers reaping more free cash if they can do so without impacting sales.
-53.82%
AR shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.72%
Growth of 1.72% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-253.19%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is -31.83%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-64.96%
Negative CFO growth while Energy median is -11.27%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-28.21%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 16.29%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-99.34%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
290.96%
Purchases growth of 290.96% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-95.71%
We liquidate less yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-27.76%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-217.12%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 9.02%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
78.13%
Debt repayment growth of 78.13% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.