40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-188.64%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.84%
Deferred tax growth of 11.84% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-15.09%
SBC declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-53.33%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-342.86%
AR shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.33%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-24.19%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
6.99%
CFO growth of 6.99% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-72.20%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-99.23%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
1080.00%
Purchases growth of 1080.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
72.20%
Proceeds growth of 72.20% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-47.32%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-129.52%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
98.87%
Debt repayment growth of 98.87% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-84.91%
We reduce issuance yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.