40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
253.38%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 55.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
1.63%
D&A expands slightly while Energy is negative at -1.55%. Peter Lynch might see peers pausing expansions more aggressively.
-50.59%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-48.89%
SBC declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-73.91%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
202.94%
AR growth of 202.94% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.00%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-97.87%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is -20.65%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-46.73%
Negative CFO growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-13.03%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-637.50%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
714.29%
Purchases growth of 714.29% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-84.42%
We liquidate less yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-32.12%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-57.96%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
5.88%
Debt repayment growth of 5.88% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.