40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.18%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.25%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
8.81%
D&A growth of 8.81% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
1521.43%
Deferred tax growth of 1521.43% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
303.33%
SBC growth of 303.33% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
175.97%
Working capital of 175.97% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-203.03%
AR shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
181.48%
Growth of 181.48% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
332.00%
Under 50% of Energy median of 3.18% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
63.76%
CFO growth of 63.76% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-13.98%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
678.75%
Acquisition growth of 678.75% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
13.98%
Purchases growth of 13.98% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-41.67%
We liquidate less yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-13.98%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
152.73%
Investing flow of 152.73% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
12.50%
Debt repayment growth of 12.50% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.