40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.01%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-23.63%
D&A shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-26.56%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
253.33%
SBC growth of 253.33% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-35.14%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-34.13%
AR shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
19.05%
Inventory growth of 19.05% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
44.37%
AP growth of 44.37% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-35.14%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
124.07%
Growth of 124.07% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-22.19%
Negative CFO growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-4.92%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-1249.20%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
334.85%
Growth of 334.85% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-248.55%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
98.59%
Debt repayment growth of 98.59% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.76%
Buyback growth of 62.76% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.