40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
110.84%
Net income growth of 110.84% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
15.43%
D&A growth under 50% of Energy median of 0.25%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
240.46%
Deferred tax growth of 240.46% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
16.67%
SBC growth of 16.67% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
163.53%
Working capital of 163.53% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
133.37%
AR growth of 133.37% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-100.00%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-100.00%
AP shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
119.78%
Growth of 119.78% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
8632.93%
Growth of 8632.93% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
44.87%
CFO growth of 44.87% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
24.89%
CapEx growth of 24.89% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
234.68%
Acquisition growth of 234.68% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-696.59%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
15.20%
Investing flow of 15.20% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-15084.57%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.78%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.