PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.26%
Positive revenue growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.26%
Positive gross profit growth while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-31.56%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-31.56%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
22.31%
Positive net income growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-8.55%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-8.55%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.48%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-59.62%
Dividend reduction while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-29.47%
Negative OCF growth while AR is at 7.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-205.96%
Negative FCF growth while AR is at 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
15.97%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AR's 226.56%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
15.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AR's 76.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
15.97%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
13.97%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AR's 83.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
13.97%
Below 50% of AR's 266.41%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
13.97%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
185.59%
Similar net income/share CAGR to AR's 196.15%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
185.59%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AR's 129.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
185.59%
Positive short-term CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
78.30%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 24.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
78.30%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 2.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
78.30%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 31.02%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-62.10%
Cut dividends over 10 years while AR stands at 12.12%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-62.10%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-62.10%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
42.71%
Our AR growth while AR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-25.88%
Inventory is declining while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
7.91%
Positive asset growth while AR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.99%
1.25-1.5x AR's 1.35%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
20.51%
We have some new debt while AR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.01%
SG&A growth well above AR's 24.05%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.