PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.21%
Positive revenue growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-11.05%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-11.02%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-11.02%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-18.12%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
13.67%
Positive EPS growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
11.51%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-5.18%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-3.90%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
430.43%
Dividend growth of 430.43% while AR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
98.00%
OCF growth above 1.5x AR's 7.56%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
91.59%
FCF growth above 1.5x AR's 15.38%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
187.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AR's 226.56%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
187.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 76.73%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
187.68%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
791.79%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 83.73%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
791.79%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 266.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
791.79%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
135.24%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AR's 196.15%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
135.24%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to AR's 129.17%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
135.24%
Positive short-term CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
197.22%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 24.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
197.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 2.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
197.22%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 31.02%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
93.57%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 12.12%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
93.57%
Dividend/share CAGR of 93.57% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
93.57%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 93.57% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
26.01%
Our AR growth while AR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-52.34%
Inventory is declining while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.93%
Positive asset growth while AR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.38%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AR's 1.35%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.40%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.22%
SG&A growth well above AR's 24.05%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.