PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.59%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
14.76%
Positive gross profit growth while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
53.69%
Positive EBIT growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
53.69%
Positive operating income growth while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-13.75%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.92%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-12.26%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-24.01%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-24.17%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
31.72%
Dividend growth of 31.72% while AR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-45.29%
Negative OCF growth while AR is at 7.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-407.69%
Negative FCF growth while AR is at 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
54.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AR's 226.56%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
54.38%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AR's 76.73%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
54.38%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
75.24%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AR's 83.73%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
75.24%
Below 50% of AR's 266.41%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
75.24%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-16.69%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AR is at 196.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-16.69%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AR is 129.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-16.69%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
33.77%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AR's 24.95%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
33.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 2.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
33.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to AR's 31.02%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
24.75%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 12.12%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
24.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 24.75% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
24.75%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 24.75% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
13.47%
Our AR growth while AR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
99.73%
Inventory growth of 99.73% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
16.86%
Positive asset growth while AR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
32.04%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AR's 1.35%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
49.83%
We have some new debt while AR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-78.47%
We cut SG&A while AR invests at 24.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.