PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.24%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
31.24%
Positive gross profit growth while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-45.79%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-45.79%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-101.74%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-101.90%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-101.81%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-7.67%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-5.89%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
3.25%
Dividend growth of 3.25% while AR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
50.48%
OCF growth above 1.5x AR's 7.56%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
16.10%
FCF growth similar to AR's 15.38%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
311.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AR's 226.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
311.46%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 76.73%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
311.46%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1222.66%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 83.73%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1222.66%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 266.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1222.66%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-140.96%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AR is at 196.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-140.96%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AR is 129.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-140.96%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
298.15%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 24.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
298.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 2.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
298.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 31.02%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
107.74%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 12.12%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
107.74%
Dividend/share CAGR of 107.74% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
107.74%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 107.74% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-18.05%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-59.28%
Inventory is declining while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.50%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
2.73%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AR's 1.35%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.65%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.80%
SG&A growth well above AR's 24.05%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.