PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.20%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
21.97%
Positive gross profit growth while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
42.63%
Positive EBIT growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
42.63%
Positive operating income growth while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1968.89%
Positive net income growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2385.71%
Positive EPS growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2450.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-19.18%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-18.90%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
86.34%
Dividend growth of 86.34% while AR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-54.38%
Negative OCF growth while AR is at 7.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-242.61%
Negative FCF growth while AR is at 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
114.98%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AR's 226.56%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
114.98%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AR's 76.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
114.98%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
103.79%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AR's 83.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
103.79%
Below 50% of AR's 266.41%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
103.79%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
195.52%
Similar net income/share CAGR to AR's 196.15%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
195.52%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 129.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
195.52%
Positive short-term CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
67.87%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 24.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
67.87%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 2.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
67.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 31.02%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
89.40%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 12.12%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
89.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 89.40% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
89.40%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 89.40% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
37.86%
Our AR growth while AR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
103.35%
Inventory growth of 103.35% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-3.30%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
23.70%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AR's 1.35%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-8.94%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.18%
We cut SG&A while AR invests at 24.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.