PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.61%
Positive revenue growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
104.36%
Positive gross profit growth while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
79.08%
Positive EBIT growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
79.08%
Positive operating income growth while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-37.63%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-26.99%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-28.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.33%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
1.66%
Slight or no buyback while AR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.21%
Dividend growth of 0.21% while AR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-32.85%
Negative OCF growth while AR is at 7.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-69.47%
Negative FCF growth while AR is at 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
478.08%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 226.56%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
478.08%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 76.73%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
135.70%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1624.12%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 83.73%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1624.12%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 266.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
153.74%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1366.29%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 196.15% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1366.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 129.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
149.45%
Positive short-term CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
431.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 24.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
431.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 2.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
132.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 31.02%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
230.26%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 12.12%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
230.26%
Dividend/share CAGR of 230.26% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
177.01%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 177.01% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-15.21%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-12.48%
Inventory is declining while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-3.80%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
4.11%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AR's 1.35%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-12.91%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
276.65%
SG&A growth well above AR's 24.05%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.