Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)

Positive revenue growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive gross profit growth while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Dividend growth of 100.38% while AR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

OCF growth above 1.5x AR's 7.56%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.

10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 226.56%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 76.73%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

Positive 3Y CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 83.73%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 266.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 196.15% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 129.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

Positive short-term CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 24.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 2.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 31.02%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 12.12%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.

Dividend/share CAGR of 779.23% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 354.22% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Our AR growth while AR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Positive asset growth while AR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

We have some new debt while AR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.