PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.50%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
8.09%
Positive gross profit growth while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-15.22%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-15.22%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
12.56%
Net income growth under 50% of AR's 30.47%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.68%
EPS growth under 50% of AR's 41.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.47%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AR's 34.30%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.98%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.72%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-6.54%
Dividend reduction while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-9.04%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
14.63%
Positive FCF growth while AR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
19.07%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AR's 1353.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
108.65%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AR's 154.85%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
115.36%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AR's 108.12%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
-27.39%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while AR stands at 286.88%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
86.39%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AR's 60.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
25.77%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AR's 222.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1092.89%
Below 50% of AR's 9129.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
558.23%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 58.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
23446.77%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 252.01%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-13.60%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while AR stands at 251.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-10.17%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-18.75%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-78.01%
Cut dividends over 10 years while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
205.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 205.07% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
128.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 128.06% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-9.15%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.74%
Positive asset growth while AR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
19.76%
Similar to AR's 18.03%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-0.75%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.