PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-20.58%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-40.39%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-41.75%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-41.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-63.52%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-63.08%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-62.83%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.29%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.63%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
13.73%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while AR cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
22.06%
Positive OCF growth while AR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-11.41%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
44.06%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AR's 699.02%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
54.52%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AR's 70.17%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
2.64%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AR's 65.35%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
88.97%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AR's 173.50%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
122.94%
Positive OCF/share growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
100.66%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 64.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
167.57%
Below 50% of AR's 489.74%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
156.51%
Below 50% of AR's 1434.45%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
23.02%
Below 50% of AR's 160.33%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
0.40%
Below 50% of AR's 272.60%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-7.34%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-17.62%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AR is at 0.41%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-75.18%
Cut dividends over 10 years while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
223.44%
Dividend/share CAGR of 223.44% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
170.29%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while AR cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-16.29%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
Positive asset growth while AR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.01%
1.25-1.5x AR's 2.97%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
4.12%
Debt growth far above AR's 1.88%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.80%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.