PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.64%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of AR's 10.17%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
13.14%
Positive gross profit growth while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-2020.00%
Negative EBIT growth while AR is at 996.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4550.00%
Negative operating income growth while AR is at 4865.17%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-165.00%
Negative net income growth while AR stands at 323.84%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-165.22%
Negative EPS growth while AR is at 318.75%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-177.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AR is at 312.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.59%
Share reduction while AR is at 0.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AR's 0.44%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
1.61%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while AR cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-14.41%
Negative OCF growth while AR is at 64.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-45.30%
Negative FCF growth while AR is at 67.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
10.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AR's 179.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-10.27%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AR stands at 75.32%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
19.45%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
5.42%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AR's 11.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
53.88%
Below 50% of AR's 108.24%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
25.98%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
94.58%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-137.68%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AR is 156.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
34.78%
Below 50% of AR's 219.62%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-38.35%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while AR stands at 15.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-1.32%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
112.72%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 32.51%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
19.47%
Stable or rising dividend while AR is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
224.25%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while AR is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
48.27%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while AR cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
12.58%
AR growth well above AR's 13.47%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.87%
Asset growth above 1.5x AR's 0.30%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-0.86%
We have a declining book value while AR shows 2.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
7.39%
We have some new debt while AR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.19%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.