Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)

Positive revenue growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive gross profit growth while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Positive net income growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.

Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x CVE's 100.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

Positive short-term CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

Positive growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while CVE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.

Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.

Our AR growth while CVE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Positive asset growth while CVE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while CVE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We have some new debt while CVE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We expand SG&A while CVE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.