Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)

Positive revenue growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive gross profit growth while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Slight or no buybacks while CVE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.

Slight or no buyback while CVE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.

Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x CVE's 100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x CVE's 100.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

Positive short-term CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

Positive growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while CVE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Stable or rising dividend while CVE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.

Dividend/share CAGR of 108.99% while CVE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

Our short-term dividend growth is positive while CVE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.

Positive asset growth while CVE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.