PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.74%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-14.35%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1.92%
Positive EBIT growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.92%
Positive operating income growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
790.82%
Positive net income growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
669.68%
Positive EPS growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
695.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
16.06%
Slight or no buybacks while CVE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
13.32%
Slight or no buyback while CVE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-13.05%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
185.43%
OCF growth above 1.5x CVE's 80.53%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
359.97%
FCF growth under 50% of CVE's 1306.98%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
96.87%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
96.87%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
133.35%
Positive 3Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
582.93%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
582.93%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CVE's 100.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
739.11%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2356.55%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2356.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x CVE's 100.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1208.71%
Positive short-term CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
225.79%
Positive growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
225.79%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
178.43%
Positive short-term equity growth while CVE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
242.32%
Stable or rising dividend while CVE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
242.32%
Dividend/share CAGR of 242.32% while CVE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
226.57%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while CVE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-34.82%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-84.84%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.50%
Positive asset growth while CVE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.02%
Positive BV/share change while CVE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-19.67%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.02%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.