PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.06%
Positive revenue growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.02%
Positive gross profit growth while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
32.10%
Positive EBIT growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
32.10%
Positive operating income growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-37.05%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-35.36%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-35.27%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-2.40%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.46%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.04%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-28.82%
Negative OCF growth while CVE is at 80.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-59.97%
Negative FCF growth while CVE is at 1306.98%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
55.68%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
55.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
168.76%
Positive 3Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
150.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
393.30%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
393.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x CVE's 100.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
640.48%
Positive short-term CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
364.68%
Positive growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
364.68%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
164.04%
Positive short-term equity growth while CVE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
457.61%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while CVE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-3.37%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
39.43%
We show growth while CVE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.32%
Positive asset growth while CVE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.82%
Positive BV/share change while CVE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
6.76%
We have some new debt while CVE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.01%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.