PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-38.37%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-62.05%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-71.04%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-71.04%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-69.69%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-69.70%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-69.64%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.13%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.33%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while CVE cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-33.19%
Negative OCF growth while CVE is at 80.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-73.31%
Negative FCF growth while CVE is at 1306.98%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
415.69%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
344.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
161.95%
Positive 3Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
438.64%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
372.62%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CVE's 100.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-21.13%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1378.39%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
417.65%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x CVE's 100.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-39.82%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
518.48%
Positive growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
246.88%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
89.84%
Positive short-term equity growth while CVE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
2016.49%
Stable or rising dividend while CVE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
5483.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 5483.84% while CVE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
518.27%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while CVE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-23.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-59.38%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-6.43%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.83%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
22.83%
We have some new debt while CVE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
311.11%
We expand SG&A while CVE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.