PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
164.83%
Positive revenue growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
195.15%
Positive gross profit growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
147.80%
Positive EBIT growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
147.80%
Positive operating income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
262.73%
Positive net income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.00%
Positive EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
95.12%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
13.18%
Slight or no buybacks while MTDR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
15.39%
Slight or no buyback while MTDR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
104.38%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MTDR's 0.08%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
314.66%
Positive OCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-165.88%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
247.56%
AR growth well above MTDR's 2.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
570.74%
Inventory growth well above MTDR's 23.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
212.52%
Asset growth above 1.5x MTDR's 1.79%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
193.38%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MTDR's 2.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
250.84%
Debt growth far above MTDR's 0.54%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
731.43%
We expand SG&A while MTDR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.