PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.26%
Positive revenue growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.26%
Positive gross profit growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-31.56%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-31.56%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
22.31%
Positive net income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-8.55%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-8.55%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.48%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-59.62%
Dividend reduction while MTDR stands at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-29.47%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-205.96%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
15.97%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 690.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
15.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1272.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
15.97%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
13.97%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1566.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
13.97%
Below 50% of MTDR's 362.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
13.97%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
185.59%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 163.75%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
185.59%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 139.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
185.59%
Positive short-term CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
78.30%
Below 50% of MTDR's 274.37%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
78.30%
Below 50% of MTDR's 204.54%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
78.30%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of MTDR's 101.40%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
-62.10%
Cut dividends over 10 years while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-62.10%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-62.10%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MTDR invests at 529.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
42.71%
AR growth well above MTDR's 2.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-25.88%
Inventory is declining while MTDR stands at 23.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
7.91%
Asset growth above 1.5x MTDR's 1.79%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.99%
Similar to MTDR's 2.09%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
20.51%
Debt growth far above MTDR's 0.54%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.01%
We expand SG&A while MTDR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.