PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.21%
Positive revenue growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-11.05%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-11.02%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-11.02%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-18.12%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
13.67%
Positive EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
11.51%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-5.18%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-3.90%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
430.43%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MTDR's 0.08%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
98.00%
Positive OCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
91.59%
Positive FCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
187.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 690.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
187.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1272.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
187.68%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
791.79%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 1566.28%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
791.79%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 362.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
791.79%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
135.24%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of MTDR's 163.75%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
135.24%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to MTDR's 139.65%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
135.24%
Positive short-term CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
197.22%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 274.37%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
197.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with MTDR's 204.54%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
197.22%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 101.40%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
93.57%
Dividend/share CAGR of 93.57% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
93.57%
Dividend/share CAGR of 93.57% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
93.57%
Below 50% of MTDR's 529.33%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
26.01%
AR growth well above MTDR's 2.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-52.34%
Inventory is declining while MTDR stands at 23.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.93%
Asset growth above 1.5x MTDR's 1.79%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
6.38%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MTDR's 2.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.40%
We’re deleveraging while MTDR stands at 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.22%
We expand SG&A while MTDR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.