PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.59%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
14.76%
Positive gross profit growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
53.69%
Positive EBIT growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
53.69%
Positive operating income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-13.75%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.92%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-12.26%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-24.01%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-24.17%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
31.72%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MTDR's 0.08%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-45.29%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-407.69%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
54.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 690.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
54.38%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1272.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
54.38%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
75.24%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1566.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
75.24%
Below 50% of MTDR's 362.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
75.24%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-16.69%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is at 163.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-16.69%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is 139.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-16.69%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
33.77%
Below 50% of MTDR's 274.37%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
33.77%
Below 50% of MTDR's 204.54%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
33.77%
Below 50% of MTDR's 101.40%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
24.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 24.75% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
24.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 24.75% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
24.75%
Below 50% of MTDR's 529.33%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
13.47%
AR growth well above MTDR's 2.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
99.73%
Inventory growth well above MTDR's 23.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
16.86%
Asset growth above 1.5x MTDR's 1.79%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
32.04%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MTDR's 2.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
49.83%
Debt growth far above MTDR's 0.54%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-78.47%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.