PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.15%
Positive revenue growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.37%
Positive gross profit growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
3.15%
Positive EBIT growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3.15%
Positive operating income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-68.39%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-67.71%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-68.09%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.94%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.81%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-2.08%
Dividend reduction while MTDR stands at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
36.66%
Positive OCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
26.91%
Positive FCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
51.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 690.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
51.13%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1272.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
147.06%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.42%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-8.69%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is at 163.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-8.69%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is 139.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
131.47%
Positive short-term CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
227.88%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of MTDR's 274.37%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
227.88%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 204.54%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
82.92%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of MTDR's 101.40%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.66%
Below 50% of MTDR's 529.33%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
32.45%
AR growth well above MTDR's 2.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
59.90%
Inventory growth well above MTDR's 23.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
10.94%
Asset growth above 1.5x MTDR's 1.79%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.64%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MTDR's 2.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
17.58%
Debt growth far above MTDR's 0.54%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
214.77%
We expand SG&A while MTDR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.