PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.06%
Positive revenue growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.02%
Positive gross profit growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
32.10%
Positive EBIT growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
32.10%
Positive operating income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-37.05%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-35.36%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-35.27%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-2.40%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.46%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.04%
Dividend reduction while MTDR stands at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-28.82%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-59.97%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
55.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 690.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
55.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1272.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
168.76%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
150.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
393.30%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 163.75% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
393.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 139.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
640.48%
Positive short-term CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
364.68%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 274.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
364.68%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 204.54%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
164.04%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 101.40%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
457.61%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of MTDR's 529.33%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
-3.37%
Firm’s AR is declining while MTDR shows 2.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
39.43%
Inventory growth well above MTDR's 23.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.32%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 1.79%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
4.82%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MTDR's 2.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
6.76%
Debt growth far above MTDR's 0.54%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.01%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.