PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.68%
Positive revenue growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-15.05%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-50.68%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-50.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-51.59%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-56.72%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-55.93%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
11.56%
Slight or no buybacks while MTDR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
9.59%
Slight or no buyback while MTDR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-12.92%
Dividend reduction while MTDR stands at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
2.05%
Positive OCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
163.87%
Positive FCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
157.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 690.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
157.63%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1272.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
122.16%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
270.05%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1566.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
270.05%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 362.73%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
224.70%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
650.34%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 163.75% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
650.34%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 139.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
162.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
290.52%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with MTDR's 274.37%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
290.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 204.54%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
119.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 101.40%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
355.76%
Dividend/share CAGR of 355.76% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
355.76%
Dividend/share CAGR of 355.76% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
1102.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 529.33%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
17.20%
AR growth well above MTDR's 2.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
15.68%
Inventory growth well above MTDR's 23.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.31%
Negative asset growth while MTDR invests at 1.79%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-15.40%
We have a declining book value while MTDR shows 2.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
9.64%
Debt growth far above MTDR's 0.54%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.06%
We expand SG&A while MTDR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.