PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.16%
Positive revenue growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-17.99%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-56.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-56.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-89.54%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-90.63%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-90.63%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.03%
Slight or no buybacks while MTDR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.36%
Dividend reduction while MTDR stands at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
37.95%
Positive OCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
55.02%
Positive FCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
65.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 690.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
94.28%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1272.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
6.58%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
213.68%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 362.73%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
75.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-90.22%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is at 163.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-92.17%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is 139.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-98.02%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
575.59%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 274.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
154.17%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of MTDR's 204.54%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
45.39%
Below 50% of MTDR's 101.40%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
723.35%
Dividend/share CAGR of 723.35% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
303.91%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 529.33%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
7.14%
AR growth well above MTDR's 2.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
2.39%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MTDR's 23.07%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
9.58%
Asset growth above 1.5x MTDR's 1.79%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.91%
1.25-1.5x MTDR's 2.09%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
59.39%
Debt growth far above MTDR's 0.54%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.83%
We expand SG&A while MTDR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.