PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
411.79%
Revenue growth of 411.79% while MTDR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
109.76%
Gross profit growth of 109.76% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
390.41%
EBIT growth of 390.41% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
390.41%
Operating income growth of 390.41% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
134.28%
Net income growth of 134.28% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
135.22%
EPS growth of 135.22% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
131.68%
Diluted EPS growth of 131.68% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
-1.53%
Share reduction while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.26%
Reduced diluted shares while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.88%
Dividend growth of 0.88% while MTDR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-155.54%
Negative OCF growth while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-428.52%
Negative FCF growth while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
485.87%
10Y CAGR of 485.87% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
42.39%
5Y CAGR of 42.39% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-15.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-873.63%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-158.49%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-148.48%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
1878.88%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1878.88% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
4931.70%
Net income/share CAGR of 4931.70% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
259.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 259.43% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
661.15%
Equity/share CAGR of 661.15% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
91.17%
Equity/share CAGR of 91.17% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
26.08%
Equity/share CAGR of 26.08% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
926.54%
Dividend/share CAGR of 926.54% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
394.15%
Dividend/share CAGR of 394.15% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
16.75%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 16.75% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
11.27%
AR growth of 11.27% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
25.00%
Inventory growth of 25.00% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
0.33%
Asset growth of 0.33% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
8.72%
BV/share growth of 8.72% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
0.46%
Debt growth of 0.46% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.43%
We cut SG&A while MTDR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.