PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.14%
Revenue growth under 50% of MTDR's 52.30%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
34.16%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of MTDR's 54.93%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
163.86%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 120.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
163.86%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 120.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
125.64%
Net income growth comparable to MTDR's 125.92%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
126.42%
EPS growth similar to MTDR's 126.15%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
124.53%
Similar diluted EPS growth to MTDR's 126.15%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.13%
Positive OCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
75.96%
Positive FCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
40.92%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 177.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-41.24%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 177.24%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-72.36%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 177.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
164.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-53.36%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-50.87%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-26.73%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is at 828.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-90.82%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is 828.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-85.31%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MTDR is 828.16%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
148.96%
Equity/share CAGR of 148.96% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
5.84%
Equity/share CAGR of 5.84% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-16.84%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
397.82%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 0.16%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
101.84%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 0.16%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
-50.10%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MTDR invests at 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
3.32%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MTDR's 17.26%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.81%
Asset growth well under 50% of MTDR's 8.48%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.44%
Under 50% of MTDR's 2.89%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
5.89%
Debt shrinking faster vs. MTDR's 112.50%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.74%
We cut SG&A while MTDR invests at 18.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.