PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.22%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MTDR's 5.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
145.91%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MTDR's 5.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
94.03%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MTDR's 6.34%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
94.03%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MTDR's 6.34%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
16.06%
Positive net income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.00%
Positive EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
16.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.03%
Share reduction while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.03%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while MTDR cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
80.98%
Positive OCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
318.67%
Positive FCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-26.89%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 189.94%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-81.46%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 189.94%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-73.05%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 189.94%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
232.03%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of MTDR's 271.46%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
-47.72%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is at 271.46%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-56.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 271.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1358.85%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-234.80%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-5178.11%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-14.95%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-71.85%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-77.43%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
352.84%
Stable or rising dividend while MTDR is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-0.69%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-49.99%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-6.11%
Firm’s AR is declining while MTDR shows 37.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-63.93%
Inventory is declining while MTDR stands at 7.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-5.80%
Negative asset growth while MTDR invests at 9.51%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-19.25%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.35%
Debt shrinking faster vs. MTDR's 76.67%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.37%
We expand SG&A while MTDR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.