PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
56.59%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MTDR's 36.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
169.31%
Positive gross profit growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
346.02%
Positive EBIT growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
346.02%
Positive operating income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
93.57%
Positive net income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
93.61%
Positive EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
93.61%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.03%
Share count expansion well above MTDR's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Dividend reduction while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-37.22%
Negative OCF growth while MTDR is at 52.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-117.36%
Negative FCF growth while MTDR is at 10.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
50.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 549.22%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-71.91%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 549.22%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
244.02%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 549.22%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
136.69%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 448.07%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-66.16%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is at 448.07%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-47.37%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 448.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-159.62%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-107.51%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-112.83%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
24.14%
Positive growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-74.10%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-67.48%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
908.15%
Stable or rising dividend while MTDR is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-0.47%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-0.02%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-4.93%
Firm’s AR is declining while MTDR shows 34.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.11%
Negative asset growth while MTDR invests at 7.34%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.09%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
22.57%
Debt growth far above MTDR's 41.51%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1198.04%
We expand SG&A while MTDR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.