PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
87.35%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MTDR's 20.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
167.60%
Gross profit growth similar to MTDR's 167.06%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
626.67%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MTDR's 288.74%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
626.67%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MTDR's 288.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
269.37%
Net income growth comparable to MTDR's 262.01%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
267.80%
EPS growth similar to MTDR's 260.71%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
268.94%
Similar diluted EPS growth to MTDR's 260.71%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
0.77%
Share count expansion well above MTDR's 1.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.01%
Reduced diluted shares while MTDR is at 1.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-27.09%
Dividend reduction while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
63.91%
Similar OCF growth to MTDR's 60.36%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
77.45%
FCF growth above 1.5x MTDR's 24.57%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
48.21%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 570.21%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-72.38%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 570.21%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
35.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 570.21%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-20.66%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 60.75%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-71.73%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is at 60.75%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-37.84%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 60.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
64.92%
Below 50% of MTDR's 2055.50%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-39.07%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is 2055.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
244.85%
Below 50% of MTDR's 2055.50%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-17.51%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-74.01%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-68.30%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
305.40%
Stable or rising dividend while MTDR is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-63.33%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-26.38%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-13.44%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-19.51%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.54%
Asset growth well under 50% of MTDR's 12.98%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
12.03%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MTDR's 6.03%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.22%
We’re deleveraging while MTDR stands at 19.51%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.