PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-29.84%
Negative revenue growth while MTDR stands at 8.21%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-38.48%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-75.06%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-75.06%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-74.25%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-74.75%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-74.75%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.30%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MTDR's 3.90%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.30%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MTDR's 3.96%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-1.22%
Dividend reduction while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
68.77%
Positive OCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
445.88%
Positive FCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
4.54%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 418.72%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-86.86%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 418.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-42.75%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 418.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
55.03%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 345.49%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-68.93%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is at 345.49%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-29.63%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 345.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
12.32%
Below 50% of MTDR's 424.56%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-94.62%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is 424.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-69.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MTDR is 424.56%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-15.29%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-76.73%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-68.89%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
717.34%
Stable or rising dividend while MTDR is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-63.63%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-27.41%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-14.94%
Firm’s AR is declining while MTDR shows 5.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
107.58%
Inventory growth well above MTDR's 15.08%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.21%
Asset growth well under 50% of MTDR's 8.32%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.67%
Under 50% of MTDR's 36.38%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.50%
We have some new debt while MTDR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.11%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MTDR's 30.03%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.