PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-21.42%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-28.98%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-57.88%
Negative EBIT growth while MTDR is at 16.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-57.88%
Negative operating income growth while MTDR is at 16.94%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
50.49%
Net income growth above 1.5x MTDR's 4.82%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
50.61%
EPS growth above 1.5x MTDR's 4.90%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
50.48%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MTDR's 5.59%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.27%
Share count expansion well above MTDR's 0.08%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.35%
Dividend growth of 2.35% while MTDR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-1.10%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
940.00%
Positive FCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-63.78%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 448.85%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-37.08%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 448.85%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-43.90%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-84.61%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 84.19%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-57.43%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is at 84.19%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-45.43%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-130.43%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-1172.56%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-568.09%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-54.65%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-68.92%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
1.71%
Positive short-term equity growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-28.47%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-76.83%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-76.83%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
37.45%
AR growth well above MTDR's 19.69%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-26.47%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-9.54%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-8.46%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-10.00%
We’re deleveraging while MTDR stands at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.63%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.