PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
28.38%
Positive revenue growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
46.50%
Positive gross profit growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
202.59%
Positive EBIT growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
202.59%
Positive operating income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
125.83%
Positive net income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
125.00%
Positive EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
125.32%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.20%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MTDR's 3.24%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.51%
Reduced diluted shares while MTDR is at 3.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.19%
Dividend reduction while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
86.32%
OCF growth above 1.5x MTDR's 39.85%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
401.67%
Positive FCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-90.79%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 650.72%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-29.92%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 44.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-15.32%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 53.13%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-77.27%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 566.94%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-26.83%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is at 90.21%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
71.99%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to MTDR's 65.57%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-99.14%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is at 131.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-83.96%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
102.78%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to MTDR's 105.35%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
-78.42%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-7.26%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 39.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-14.91%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 57.23%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-96.32%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-89.89%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-67.57%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MTDR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-16.54%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.26%
Asset growth well under 50% of MTDR's 23.41%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-1.23%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.03%
We’re deleveraging while MTDR stands at 85.50%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.70%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.