Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)

Negative revenue growth while MTDR stands at 33.95%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while MTDR is at 47.39%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Negative EBIT growth while MTDR is at 56.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Negative operating income growth while MTDR is at 56.60%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Negative net income growth while MTDR stands at 74.63%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while MTDR is at 75.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while MTDR is at 74.51%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.

Negative OCF growth while MTDR is at 52.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while MTDR is at 92.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 526.27%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 523.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.

3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 63.17%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 1288.25%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of MTDR's 551.29%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.

3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 111.04%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is at 441.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Below 50% of MTDR's 178.84%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.

Below 50% of MTDR's 70.87%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.

Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MTDR stands at 106.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 176.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.

Cut dividends over 10 years while MTDR stands at 1449.73%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

Negative asset growth while MTDR invests at 2.56%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.

We have a declining book value while MTDR shows 7.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.

Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.

SG&A growth well above MTDR's 9.96%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.