PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.48%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
56.29%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
100.00%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
674.16%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
293.08%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
295.08%
EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 4.76%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
293.44%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 5.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.54%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.12%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.75%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-303.52%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 147.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
81.41%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
220.27%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 179.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-38.39%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE stands at 184.32%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is at 2764.68%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
112.39%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 155.92%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
107.03%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 172.18%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-77.53%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-13.77%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
77.24%
Below 50% of OBE's 344.68%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
77.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to OBE's 80.23%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
35.18%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
208.95%
Dividend/share CAGR of 208.95% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
19.48%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.48% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
272.06%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.50%
Similar to OBE's 3.41%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-2.50%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.