PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.44%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
29.73%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
53.71%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
53.71%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
206.43%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
285.71%
EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 4.76%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
280.22%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 5.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-6.66%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-5.30%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
18.14%
Dividend growth of 18.14% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
107.95%
Positive OCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
160.51%
FCF growth similar to OBE's 147.32%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
145.26%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
145.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of OBE's 179.84%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
145.26%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
579.48%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 184.32%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
579.48%
Below 50% of OBE's 2764.68%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
579.48%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
487.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 155.92% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
487.81%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 172.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
487.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
129.02%
Positive growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
129.02%
Below 50% of OBE's 344.68%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
129.02%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 80.23%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
19.22%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
19.22%
Dividend/share CAGR of 19.22% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
19.22%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.22% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
27.30%
Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-7.72%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.71%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
24.90%
BV/share growth above 1.5x OBE's 3.41%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-20.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.27%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.