PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.27%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-18.09%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-37.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-37.33%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-7.16%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
19.09%
EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 4.76%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
19.36%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 5.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-7.63%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-8.96%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
54.70%
Dividend growth of 54.70% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-4.41%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-68.29%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 147.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-4.98%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-4.98%
Negative 5Y CAGR while OBE stands at 179.84%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-4.98%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
91.92%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 184.32%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
91.92%
Below 50% of OBE's 2764.68%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
91.92%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
84.33%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 155.92%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
84.33%
Below 50% of OBE's 172.18%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
84.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-5.69%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-5.69%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while OBE is at 344.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-5.69%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while OBE is at 80.23%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-9.76%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-9.76%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-9.76%
Negative near-term dividend growth while OBE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-17.71%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
52.18%
Inventory growth of 52.18% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
9.68%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
20.82%
BV/share growth above 1.5x OBE's 3.41%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
14.53%
We have some new debt while OBE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.40%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.